19 Jul

How to treat Capital Gains on a principle residence when units in the home are rented

Income Tax

Posted by: Garth Chapman

This is a good article I found on the MoneySense website

When you buy real estate you expect that, over time, it will appreciate in value. If you sell that property for more than you paid, you will have an appreciable gain in value and this triggers a taxable capital gain for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).
Your home can be an effective tax shelter, but other forms of real estate can attract capital gains taxes. Here’s what you need to know about some of the more nuanced real estate scenarios.

Many readers want to know if their home will continue to qualify for the principal residence exemption if they rent out a portion of their house. Their concern is prompted by stories of people who lost this exemption after years of renting out their basement.

While it’s true—you can lose your principal residence exemption—it really only happens if you rent out more than 50% of your home, or when you decide to claim capital cost allowance on the portion of your home that is the rental. The CRA recognizes that, over time, depreciable property will become obsolete. Believe it or not, this also applies to real estate. Because of this you are well within your right to offset this loss in value by deducting the depreciation over a period of several years. This deduction is the capital cost allowance (CCA). However, if you claim CCA on your home, you are effectively telling the taxman that this property is used to produce income, and you use lose the opportunity to claim a capital gain, which is taxed much more favourably than income.

But what if you buy a duplex or fourplex and live in one unit while renting out the others? Can you deduct costs, including CCA, to offset the rental income you collect each year and still claim a principal residence exemption? Yes: but you’ll need to clearly document what portion is for personal use and what portion is rental. Only deduct expenses for the rental portion. When you sell, you can claim the principal residence exemption for the portion that was for personal use. To understand how this all works, consider the following:

  • Buy a duplex for $400,000.
  • Rent out one unit (for $1,500 per month) and live in another.
  • Each year you report your annual rental income (about $18,000) and then offset these earnings with expenses associated with the unit.
  • Remember: you cannot deduct expenses, including CCA, for the personal portion of the duplex.
  • After four years you sell the duplex for $500,000.
  • Because 50% of the property is used for personal use, you can shelter 50% of the $100,000 capital gain.

But be forewarned: CRA is cracking down on income generated from real estate, and in order to qualify for the principal residence exemption no more than 50% of a principal home can be used for rental purposes. For people thinking of buying and investing homes with a personal use portion you may want to seek out professional advice.
Read on here http://www.moneysense.ca/columns/can-you-avoid-capital-gains-tax/

19 Jul

On Depreciating Rental Properties (aka Claiming CCA) How to Manage this.

Income Tax

Posted by: Garth Chapman

On your tax return you have the option to depreciate your buildings (to claim CCA). The elements of this to consider include those below, and perhaps others as well. This is both a tax planning decision and a mortgage qualification capacity decision.

  • Claiming the CCA is actually optional and it can be started and stopped from year to year.
  • CCA cannot be taken on a property that has the possibility of a principle residence exemption.
  • Claiming CCA reduces your ‘cost base’ for the property. This results in a higher Capital Gains tax when you sell the property.
  • If you claim CCA you are depreciating for tax purposes the buildings on the land. The land does not depreciate.
  • If you claim CCA (depreciate your buildings) you will reduce your taxes now, but you will pay more tax when you sell the properties, as you will have to ‘recapture’ the previously claimed CCA.
  • If you claim CCA the taxes currently saved are taxes on income whereas the future taxes are on capital gains, and there may be a difference in rate between the two.
  • Consider what your likely income will be at the time you sell the properties, and how that might impact your tax rate then as compared to now.
  • When you claim CCA you thereby reduce your income from the properties on your tax return. Lower income can have a negative impact on your ability to obtain further mortgages from some lenders.

The above tips are what I have learned over the years from various Canadian Tax Accountants.  Your own situation is always unique, so always seek out professional advice before you make tax decisions.

 

19 Jul

It’s taxes versus a mortgage for the self-employed

Income Tax

Posted by: Garth Chapman

Canada’s government as been acting since 2009 to tighten mortgage lending requirements in their ongoing efforts to ensure Canadians do not face the ruinous housing collapse endured by Americans and many Europeans since the collapse of 2008.  As a signatory to the Basil Accords along with the USA and all the Euro nations Canada’s government is obligated to comply its banks to adhere to much stricter underwriting guidelines and due diligence.  And this has made it tougher for all Canadians to obtain mortgage financing.  Since Guideline B-20 came into effect in 2012 those of us (myself included) who are self-employed (BFS or Business For Self in industry parlance) have been heavily impacted.

Most self-employed Canadians will, usually following the advice of their Tax Advisers, will focus on lowering their taxable income via the use of various expenses to their business.  This is effected easily both with incorporated businesses and for those operating as proprietorships.  This results in lower line 150 income on the personal tax return, sometimes by significant amounts.

Prior to B-20 guidelines being in effect, such borrowers could qualify by simply ‘declaring’ their income, in effect adding back those deductions, and along with proving their self employed status and often backing up the numbers with bank statements showing the scope of cash flowing through those accounts.

There is an excellent piece on the tougher hurdles Canada’s self-employed now face in getting a mortgage, and what they can do to improve their prospects here in the Globe and Mail’s article It’s taxes versus a mortgage for the self-employed

30 Apr

The rainy day debate: Contribute to your RRSP or pay off debt?

Financial

Posted by: Garth Chapman

A good article on an age-old question. Rob’ Carricks bottom line advice: RRSPs beat a mortgage paydown in today’s low-rate world, but credit cards and high-rate loans and lines of credit beat RRSPs.

Get rid of that high-rate debt. Kill it dead.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-finance/retirement-rrsps/the-rainy-day-debate-contribute-to-your-rrsp-or-pay-off-debt/article7928044/